Perpustakaan SMPN 1 Sindang

  • Beranda
  • login
  • visitor
  • Bantuan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
No image available for this title
Penanda Bagikan

Text

INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS

Patrisius Istiarto Djiwandono - Nama Orang;

Abstract
In the area of writing, research has yet to explore EFL learners’ ability to use varied vocabulary.
Although vocabulary teaching has enriched learners’ knowledge of lexical items, whether they can
use the words they have learned remains to be seen. It is important, therefore, to investigate their
lexical richness in their academic writing. Lexical richness, defined as the presence of different
words in a text, is commonly measured through type-token ratio (TTR). The present study set out to
identify the lexical richness of senior students by comparing them to academic papers written by their
lecturers. There are four objectives: (1) to determine the difference between the type-token ratio
(TTR) in students’ essays and that in their lecturers’ essays; (2) to determine the difference between
the use of 2000-word level (henceforth K2) in students’ essays and that in their lecturers’ essays; (3)
to determine the difference between the use of academic words in students’ essays and that in their
lecturers’ essays; (4) to determine the difference between the students’ essays and their lecturers’ in
terms of the use of words other than the 2000-word level and the academic words (designated “offlist

words”). The essays written by the respondents were submitted to a website for vocabulary
profiling (http://www.lextutor/ca/vp). This analysis shows that the lecturers fare better in terms of
TTR and academic words, but write slightly fewer 2000-word level and off-list words than their
students. While the differences in TTR and academic words are significant, the differences in the use
of 2000-word level and off-list are not significant. The subsequent discussion addresses possible
causes of these differences, and offers some implications for the teaching of vocabulary and writing.


Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
Reading Interest and Habits/Kebiasaan Membaca, Minat Baca
No. Panggil
510 PAT l
Penerbit
bandung : upi.edu., 2016
Deskripsi Fisik
hlm. 315.; 20cm
Bahasa
Indonesia
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
510
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
vol. 5 nomor 2
Subjek
Politik Pemerintahan
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
Patrisius Istiarto Djiwandono
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
  • LEXICAL RICHNESS IN ACADEMIC PAPERS: A COMPARISON BETWEEN STUDENTS’ AND LECTURERS’ ESSAYS
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

Perpustakaan SMPN 1 Sindang
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

Donasi untuk SLiMS Kontribusi untuk SLiMS?

© 2025 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik
Kemana ingin Anda bagikan?